Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 183 (5), 1187-1197
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.108890
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery RateThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Characteristics of successful claims for payment by the Florida Neurologic Injury Compensation Association FundAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean SectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Update on delivery following prior cesarean section: a 15-year review 1972-1987International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1989
- Breech presentation after cesarean section: Always a section?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- True rupture of the Caesarean section scar (a 15 year review, 1972–1987)European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1989
- Delivery Following Cesarean Section and Perinatal MortalityAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1989
- When does a statistical fact become an ethical imperative?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Evaluation of elective repeat cesarean section as a standard of care: An application of decision analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981