Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Postdigital Science and Education
- Vol. 2 (3), 863-878
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic and the social distancing that followed have affected all walks of society, also education. In order to keep education running, educational institutions have had to quickly adapt to the situation. This has resulted in an unprecedented push to online learning. Many, including commercial digital learning platform providers, have rushed to provide their support and ‘solutions’, sometimes for free. The Covid-19 pandemic has therefore also created a sellers’ market in ed-tech. This paper employs a critical lens to reflect on the possible problems arising from hasty adoption of commercial digital learning solutions whose design might not always be driven by best pedagogical practices but their business model that leverages user data for profit-making. Moreover, already before Covid-19, there has been increasing critique of how ed-tech is redefining and reducing concepts of teaching and learning. The paper also challenges the narrative that claims, ‘education is broken, and it should and can be fixed with technology’. Such technologization, often seen as neutral, is closely related to educationalization, i.e. imposing growing societal problems for education to resolve. Therefore, this is a critical moment to reflect how the current choices educational institutions are making might affect with Covid-19 education and online learning: Will they reinforce capitalist instrumental view of education or promote holistic human growth? This paper urges educational leaders to think carefully about the decisions they are currently making and if they indeed pave the way to a desirable future of education.Keywords
Funding Information
- Tampere University including Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University of Applied Sciences
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- MOOCs and The Silicon Valley NarrativeJournal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015
- Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retentionBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 2014
- What's the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’?Learning, Media and Technology, 2014
- Learning AnalyticsAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2013
- Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technologyJournal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2010
- THE WINNING WAYS OF A LOSING STRATEGY: EDUCATIONALIZING SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED STATESEducational Theory, 2008
- THE GOVERNMENTALIZATION OF LEARNING AND THE ASSEMBLAGE OF A LEARNING APPARATUSEducational Theory, 2008
- Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: Technology, Politics and the Reconstruction of EducationPolicy Futures in Education, 2007
- High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent ParadoxAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2001
- Epidemic psychology: a modelSociology of Health & Illness, 1990