Direct residual stromal thickness measurement for assessing suitability for LASIK enhancement by Artemis 3D very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc scanning
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 32 (11), 1884-1888
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.020
Abstract
We present a patient scheduled for LASIK enhancement based on conventional residual stromal thickness (RST) prediction methods in whom direct measurement of the RST changed the management due to an unexpectedly low RST. The preoperative refraction was −6.00 −0.50 × 115 in the right eye and −6.00 −0.50 × 20 in the left eye. At 9 months, the refractions had regressed to −0.50 −0.50 × 150 and −0.75 −0.25 × 145, respectively. Predicted RST based on preoperative parameters was 283 μm in the right eye and 281 μm in the left eye, sufficient for the planned enhancement. Using the Artemis 3-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc scanner, the minimum RST was directly measured as 277 μm in the right eye but only 212 μm in the left eye, which may have significantly increased the risk of iatrogenic ectasia yielding a predicted post-enhancement RST of 253 μm and 192 μm, respectively. The treatment plan was altered as a result of the thinner than predicted RST in the left eye; an enhancement was performed in the right eye only. A second Artemis examination after 22 months found the RST in the left eye to be stable.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancementJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Flap thickness accuracyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2003
- Avoiding serious corneal complications of laser assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomyOphthalmology, 2000
- Epithelial and Corneal Thickness Measurements by High-frequency Ultrasound Digital Signal ProcessingOphthalmology, 1994