A systematic evaluation of payback of publicly funded health and health services research in Hong Kong
Open Access
- 30 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 7 (1), 121
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-121
Abstract
The Health and Health Services Research Fund (HHSRF) is dedicated to support research related to all aspects of health and health services in Hong Kong. We evaluated the fund's outcomes and explored factors associated with the translation of research findings to changes in health policy and provider behaviour. A locally suitable questionnaire was developed based on the "payback" evaluation framework and was sent to principal investigators of the completed research projects supported by the fund since 1993. Research "payback" in six outcome areas was surveyed, namely knowledge production, use of research in the research system, use of research project findings in health system policy/decision making, application of the research findings through changed behaviour, factors influencing the utilization of research, and health/health service/economic benefits. Principal investigators of 178 of 205 (87%) completed research projects returned the questionnaire. Investigators reported research publications in 86.5% (mean = 5.4 publications per project), career advancement 34.3%, acquisition of higher qualifications 38.2%, use of results in policy making 35.4%, changed behaviour in light of findings 49.4%, evidence of health service benefit 42.1% and generated subsequent research in 44.9% of the projects. Payback outcomes were positively associated with the amount of funding awarded. Multivariate analysis found participation of investigators in policy committees and liaison with potential users were significantly associated with reported health service benefit (odds ratio [OR]participation = 2.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–6.40; ORliaison = 2.03, 95% CI 1.05–3.91), policy and decision-making (ORparticipation = 10.53, 95% CI 4.13–26.81; ORliaison = 2.52, 95% CI 1.20–5.28), and change in behavior (ORparticipation = 3.67, 95% CI 1.53–8.81). The HHSRF has produced substantial outcomes and compared favourably with similar health research funds in other developed economies. Further studies are needed to better understand the factors and pathways associated with the translation of research findings into practice.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus ReportGut, 2007
- Health research in the UK: the price of successThe Lancet, 2006
- Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature.Cadernos de Saude Publica, 2006
- Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and PossibilitiesBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2005
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic reviewSocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Payback arising from research funding: evaluation of the Arthritis Research CampaignRheumatology, 2005
- Assessing the benefits of health research: lessons from research into the use of antenatal corticosteroids for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndromeSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2005
- Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papersJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003
- Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric studyBMJ, 2000
- Scientific Basis for the Support of Biomedical ScienceScience, 1976