Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A retrospective study of complications and outcome
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 166 (6), 1690-1697
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91558-r
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Induced Versus Non‐Induced Labor in Post‐Term Pregnancy: A Randomized Prospective StudyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1989
- Programmed Induction of Labor for Primiparous Women to Ensure Daytime DeliveryAsia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Elective induction of labor: a prospective clinical study, I: Obstetric and neonatal effectsjpme, 1985
- Hazards and benefits of elective induction of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
- A prospective randomized study of induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1983
- The Labor CurveClinics in Perinatology, 1981
- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INDUCTION OF LABOURBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1979
- SPONTANEOUS LABOR AND ELECTIVE INDUCTION—A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDYActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1979
- A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SELECTIVE PLANNED DELIVERYBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978
- ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOURThe Lancet, 1975