On the learnability of implicit arguments
- 15 April 2019
- book chapter
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 185-201
- https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.10mat
Abstract
It has been argued that the experiencer argument of seem is always syntactically projected, and should thus induce an intervention effect even when not overtly produced. The results of our experimental study provide evidence for this claim – English-speaking children perform poorly on raising with seem, whether the intervening experiencer argument is overt or implicit. Conversely, Spanish-speaking children show adult-like performance with the raising semi-modal verb parecer ‘seem’, which does not take an experiencer argument. This outcome raises questions regarding learnability, i.e. English-speaking children must know to project an implicit experiencer with seem, while Spanish-speaking children must not do so with the functional verb parecer. In this paper we provide a learning path that resolves this learning challenge.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Children’s difficulty with raising: A performance accountLanguage Acquisition, 2015
- Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 FrenchLingua, 2011
- The Explicit Syntax of Implicit ArgumentsLinguistic Inquiry, 2010
- There Began to Be a Learnability PuzzleLinguistic Inquiry, 2006
- Clitic Climbing and the Dual Status of SembrareLinguistic Inquiry, 2006
- A smuggling approach to the passive in englishSyntax, 2005
- A Smuggling Approach to Raising in EnglishLinguistic Inquiry, 2005
- Syntactic ChangePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2003
- Clitic Left Dislocation and Contrastive Left DislocationPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1997
- Thematic Roles and Syntactic StructurePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1997