Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire
- 12 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 50 (3), 544-552
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
Abstract
We advance a new account of why people endorse conspiracy theories, arguing that individuals use the social-cognitive tool of projection when making social judgments about others. In two studies, we found that individuals were more likely to endorse conspiracy theories if they thought they would be willing, personally, to participate in the alleged conspiracies. Study 1 established an association between conspiracy beliefs and personal willingness to conspire, that fully mediated a relationship between Machiavellianism and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 2, participants primed with their own morality were less inclined than controls to endorse conspiracy theories – a finding fully mediated by personal willingness to conspire. These results suggest that some people think “they conspired” because they think “I would conspire”Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudiceJournal of Research in Personality, 2009
- Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2009
- Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern PerceptionScience, 2008
- The Hidden Impact of Conspiracy Theories: Perceived and Actual Influence of Theories Surrounding the Death of Princess DianaThe Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- A TEST OF THE GRAPEVINE: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANSSociological Spectrum, 1999
- Case Closed? On the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Biased Assimilation of Evidence and Attitude PolarizationBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1995
- Belief in Conspiracy TheoriesPolitical Psychology, 1994
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986