Two faces of busy outside directors
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Ownership and Control
- Vol. 6 (2), 467-474
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i2c4p5
Abstract
In this study, we examine how multiple directorships held by outside directors (busy outside directors) influence shareholder wealth in diversifying acquisitions. With a sample of 893 diversifying acquisitions from 1998 to 2004, we find a negative (positive) busy-director effect for diversifying acquisitions of public-targets (private-targets). Busy directors are negatively (positively) associated with the five-day cumulative abnormal returns in acquisitions involving public (private) targets, where merger-related agency problems are more likely. Our evidence support the notion that, in the case of diversifying acquisitions, increased managerial monitoring plays a more important role versus enhanced advising and business connection from busy directors.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple directorships and acquirer returnsJournal of Banking & Finance, 2010
- Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?The Journal of Finance, 2006
- Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board AppointmentsThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- What Do Returns to Acquiring Firms Tell Us? Evidence from Firms That Make Many AcquisitionsThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- The take-over market for privately held companies: the US experienceCambridge Journal of Economics, 2001
- Corporate Governance and Equity PricesPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2001
- Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- The gains to bidding firms from mergerJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 1980