Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients
Open Access
- 30 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 183 (10), E673-E679
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110020
Abstract
Background: Whereas most studies have focused on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, few have dealt comprehensively with other critical interventions administered at the end of life. We surveyed cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public to determine their attitudes toward such interventions. Methods: We administered a questionnaire to four groups about their attitudes toward five end-of-life interventions — withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, active pain control, withholding of life-sustaining measures, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. We performed multivariable analyses to compare attitudes and to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with the attitudes. Results: A total of 3840 individuals — 1242 cancer patients, 1289 family caregivers and 303 oncologists from 17 hospitals, as well as 1006 members of the general Korean population — participated in the survey. A large majority in each of the groups supported withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment (87.1%–94.0%) and use of active pain control (89.0%–98.4%). A smaller majority (60.8%–76.0%) supported withholding of life-sustaining treatment. About 50% of those in the patient and general population groups supported active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, as compared with less than 40% of the family caregivers and less than 10% of the oncologists. Higher income was significantly associated with approval of the withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment and the practice of active pain control. Older age, male sex and having no religion were significantly associated with approval of withholding of life-sustaining measures. Older age, male sex, having no religion and lower education level were significantly associated with approval of active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Interpretation: Although the various participant groups shared the same attitude toward futile and ameliorative end-of-life care (the withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment and the use of active pain control), oncologists had a more negative attitude than those in the other groups toward the active ending of life (euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide).Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Korea’s National Health Insurance—Lessons From The Past Three DecadesHealth Affairs, 2011
- Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981–1999)European Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Predictors of prescription of morphine for severe cancer pain by physicians in KoreaAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Palliative care in chronic illnessBMJ, 2005
- Favorable Impact of the t(9;11) in Childhood Acute Myeloid LeukemiaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Trends: End-of-Life IssuesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1999
- Attitudes of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Their Care Givers toward Assisted SuicideThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A National Survey of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the publicThe Lancet, 1996
- Changes in Dutch opinions on active euthanasia, 1966 through 1991JAMA, 1995