Prioritizing improvement of service attributes using impact range‐performance analysis and impact‐asymmetry analysis
- 14 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Managing Service Quality: An International Journal
- Vol. 18 (6), 559-576
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520810920068
Abstract
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to describe and apply a new three-step approach to prioritizing service attributes in formulating quality-improvement strategies. In particular, the paper seels to demonstrate the value of impact range-performance analysis (IRPA) and impact-asymmetry analysis (IAA) in prioritizing quality attributes for improvement. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed new analytical framework is developed and presented. Data from a survey on satisfaction with airport passenger services are then used to demonstrate the proposed approach. Improvement priorities are derived using a three-step analytical framework. Findings – This paper raises several conceptual issues concerning importance-performance analysis (IPA). In particular, the study contends that direct and indirect measures of the “importance” of an attribute are not measuring the same construct. Practical implications – Managers who use IPA to prioritize the improvement of service attributes might obtain misleading recommendations. In particular, managers should be aware that the impact of an attribute on overall customer satisfaction can vary significantly with different levels of performance of that attribute. Originality/value – The study proposes a revised approach to IPA in which the traditional measure of “attribute-importance” is replaced by a measure of the range of attribute-impact on overall customer satisfaction (RIOCS). Moreover, a new analysis provides detailed information on asymmetric relationships between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction (OCS).Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case studyTourism Management, 2007
- The Measurement of Service Quality in the Tour Operating Sector: A Methodological ComparisonJournal of Travel Research, 2004
- Destination Benchmarking: An Indicator-System’s Potential for Exploring Guest SatisfactionJournal of Travel Research, 2004
- The Moderating Role of Confidence in Expectations and the Asymmetric Influence of Disconfirmation on Customer SatisfactionThe Service Industries Journal, 2003
- Revisiting importance–performance analysisTourism Management, 2001
- Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit ChainJournal of Service Research, 2000
- An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: a comparison of business and leisure travellersTourism Management, 2000
- Attractive quality: Its importance and the points of remarkTotal Quality Management, 2000
- The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and ImplicationsThe Service Industries Journal, 1999
- Performance-Importance Analysis of Escorted Tour EvaluationsJournal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 1996