Revised Recommendations for Iron Fortification of Wheat Flour and an Evaluation of the Expected Impact of Current National Wheat Flour Fortification Programs
Open Access
- 15 March 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Vol. 31 (1_suppl1), S7-S21
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265100311s102
Abstract
Background: Iron fortification of wheat flour is widely used as a strategy to combat iron deficiency.Objective: To review recent efficacy studies and update the guidelines for the iron fortification of wheat flour.Methods: Efficacy studies with a variety of iron-fortified foods were reviewed to determine the minimum daily amounts of additional iron that have been shown to meaningfully improve iron status in children, adolescents, and women of reproductive age. Recommendations were computed by determining the fortification levels needed to provide these additional quantities of iron each day in three different wheat flour consumption patterns. Current wheat flour iron fortification programs in 78 countries were evaluated.Results: When average daily consumption of low-extraction (≤ 0.8% ash) wheat flour is 150 to 300 g, it is recommended to add 20 ppm iron as NaFeEDTA, or 30 ppm as dried ferrous sulfate or ferrous fumarate. If sensory changes or cost limits the use of these compounds, electrolytic iron at 60 ppm is the second choice. Corresponding fortification levels were calculated for wheat flour intakes of < 150 g/day and > 300 g/day. Electrolytic iron is not recommended for flour intakes of < 150 g/day. Encapsulated ferrous sulfate or fumarate can be added at the same concentrations as the non-encapsulated compounds. For high-extraction wheat flour (> 0.8% ash), NaFeEDTA is the only iron compound recommended. Only nine national programs (Argentina, Chile, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Uruguay) were judged likely to have a significant positive impact on iron status if coverage is optimized. Most countries use non-recommended, low-bioavailability, atomized, reduced or hydrogen-reduced iron powders.Conclusion: Most current iron fortification programs are likely to be ineffective. Legislation needs updating in many countries so that flour is fortified with adequate levels of the recommended iron compounds.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of wheat-based biscuits fortified with microcapsules containing ferrous sulfate and potassium iodate or a new hydrogen-reduced elemental iron: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial in Kuwaiti womenBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2009
- Maize meal fortification is associated with improved vitamin A and iron status in adolescents and reduced childhood anaemia in a food aid-dependent refugee populationPublic Health Nutrition, 2008
- Corrigendum to: “The Economics of iron deficiency” [Food Policy 28 (2003) 51–75]Food Policy, 2006
- Regulation of Iron Metabolism by HepcidinAnnual Review of Nutrition, 2006
- The Potential of Encapsulated Iron Compounds in Food Fortification: A ReviewInternational Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 2004
- The Potential Role of NaFeEDTA as an Iron FortificantInternational Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 2004
- The Use of Iron-fortified Wheat Flour to Reduce Anemia Among the Estate Population in Sri LankaInternational Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 2004
- The Usefulness of Elemental Iron for Cereal Flour Fortification: a Sustain Task Force ReportNutrition Reviews, 2002
- Iron status in Danish men 1984–94: a cohort comparison of changes in iron stores and the prevalence of iron deficiency and iron overloadEuropean Journal of Haematology, 2002
- Ferrous fumarate fortification of a chocolate drink powderBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1991