Talking to the Academy
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 13 (2), 251-281
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004
Abstract
Hedging refers to linguistic strategies that qualify categorical commitment to express possibility rather than certainty. In scientific writing, hedging is central to effective argument: Hedging is a rhetorical means of gaining reader acceptance of claims, allowing writers to convey their attitude to the truth of their statements and to anticipate possible objections. Because hedges allow writers to express claims with precision, caution, and modesty, they are a significant resource for academics. However, little is known about the way hedging is typically expressed in particular domains or the particular functions it serves in different genres. This article identifies the major forms, functions, and distribution of hedges in a corpus of 26 molecular biology research articles and describes the importance of hedging in this genre.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in ScienceWritten Communication, 1993
- Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday's Functional GrammarJournal of Linguistics, 1988
- EPISTEMIC MODALITY AND SPOKEN DISCOURSETransactions of the Philological Society, 1987
- “Something on the order of around forty to forty-four”: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talksLanguage in Society, 1987
- Verb form and rhetorical function in science writing: A study of MS theses in biology, chemistry, and physicsThe ESP Journal, 1985
- Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology ArticlesSocial Studies of Science, 1985
- Purposive vagueness: an evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressionsJournal of Linguistics, 1985
- Some Exploratory Discourse on MetadiscourseCollege Composition and Communication, 1985
- Modifying illocutionary forceJournal of Pragmatics, 1984
- Talking scienceNature, 1983