A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition
Open Access
- 11 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Genes & Nutrition
- Vol. 7 (4), 559-566
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-012-0290-x
Abstract
Personal genetic information has become increasingly accessible to the public as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests; however, concerns have been raised over their value and potential risks. We compared the effects of providing genotype-based dietary advice with general recommendations on behavioral outcomes using a randomized controlled study. Participants were men and women from the Toronto Nutrigenomics and Health Study between the ages of 20–35 years (n = 149) who completed a survey to assess their awareness of DTC genetic tests and nutrigenomics, as well as potential motivations for undergoing genetic testing. Participants were then randomized into an intervention (I) or control (C) group and were given either genotype-based personalized dietary advice or general dietary advice, respectively. A second survey was administered to assess the participants’ opinions of the dietary reports they received. A greater proportion of participants in the intervention group agreed that they understood the dietary advice they were given (93% (I) vs. 78% (C); p = 0.009). Participants in the intervention group were more likely to agree that the dietary recommendations they received would be useful when considering their diet (88% (I) vs. 72% (C); p = 0.02) and wanted to know more about the recommendations (95% (I) vs. 76% (C); p < 0.0001). Only 9% of participants in the intervention group reported feeling uneasy about learning their genetic information. These findings suggest that individuals find dietary recommendations based on genetics more understandable and more useful than general dietary advice. Very few feel uneasy about receiving their genetic information that relates to personalized nutrition.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testingHuman Molecular Genetics, 2011
- Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research ParticipantsPublic Health Genomics, 2011
- Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genomewide Profiling to Assess Disease RiskThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The sense and nonsense of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for cardiovascular diseaseNetherlands Heart Journal, 2011
- Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumersGenetics in Medicine, 2010
- An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testingInvestigative Genetics, 2010
- Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome TestingAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2009
- An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome TestingJAMA, 2008
- Health Behavior Changes After Genetic Risk Assessment for Alzheimer Disease: The REVEAL StudyAlzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2008
- Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled dietNutrition Journal, 2007