Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Management Science
- Vol. 51 (1), 30-44
- https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215
Abstract
Under a revenue-sharing contract, a retailer pays a supplier a wholesale price for each unit purchased, plus a percentage of the revenue the retailer generates. Such contracts have become more prevalent in the videocassette rental industry relative to the more conventional wholesale price contract. This paper studies revenue-sharing contracts in a general supply chain model with revenues determined by each retailer's purchase quantity and price. Demand can be deterministic or stochastic and revenue is generated either from rentals or outright sales. Our model includes the case of a supplier selling to a classical fixed-price newsvendor or a price-setting newsvendor. We demonstrate that revenue sharing coordinates a supply chain with a single retailer (i.e., the retailer chooses optimal price and quantity) and arbitrarily allocates the supply chain's profit. We compare revenue sharing to a number of other supply chain contracts (e.g., buy-back contracts, price-discount contracts, quantity-flexibility contracts, sales-rebate contracts, franchise contracts, and quantity discounts). We find that revenue sharing is equivalent to buybacks in the newsvendor case and equivalent to price discounts in the price-setting newsvendor case. Revenue sharing also coordinates a supply chain with retailers competing in quantities, e.g., Cournot competitors or competing newsvendors with fixed prices. Despite its numerous merits, we identify several limitations of revenue sharing to (at least partially) explain why it is not prevalent in all industries. In particular, we characterize cases in which revenue sharing provides only a small improvement over the administratively cheaper wholesale price contract. Additionally, revenue sharing does not coordinate a supply chain with demand that depends on costly retail effort. We develop a variation on revenue sharing for this setting.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coordinating Contracts for Decentralized Supply Chains with Retailer Promotional EffortManagement Science, 2004
- Revenue Sharing and Vertical Control in the Video Rental IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 2001
- Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain PerformanceManufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1999
- Demand Uncertainty and Returns PoliciesInternational Economic Review, 1995
- Double-Sided Moral Hazard and the Nature of Share ContractsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Moral Hazard and Risk Spreading in PartnershipsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Vertical Control with Bilateral ContractsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- Revenue Sharing as an Incentive in an Agency Problem: An Example from the National Football LeagueThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- The Economics of Franchise ContractsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1985
- Dealer and Manufacturer MarginsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1985