Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder
- 20 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 14 (4), 227-238
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.986
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature reviewPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
- Two goodness‐of‐fit tests for logistic regression models with continuous covariatesStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitationsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001
- Applied Logistic RegressionPublished by Wiley ,2000
- Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control groupStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity ScoresAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A COMPARISON OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR THE LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- Effects of Misspecification of the Propensity Score on Estimators of Treatment EffectBiometrics, 1993
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983