The Ethics of Self-Sacrifice: What's Wrong with Suicide Bombing?
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Archives of Suicide Research
- Vol. 8 (1), 29-36
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13811110490243750
Abstract
What's wrong with suicide bombing? The tactic has been used by the Tamil Tigers, by the Japanese kamikaze, by al-Qaeda, by Palestinian militants against Israel, by Iraqi defenders loyal to Saddam Hussein against the U.S. invasion, and by others; it is typically understood by these groups as martyrdom rather than suicide. Scientific theories of suicide—biological, psychological, and sociological—do not contribute to an understanding. Nor is the claim that it is amoral, the product of psychopathology or mental illness, adequate. The central moral core of the issue of suicide bombing rests, rather, on the violation of a tacit assumption of equality in combat: “they” have a weapon “we” don't.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Palestinian H-Bomb: Terror's Winning StrategyForeign Affairs, 2002
- Suicide bombers: Business as usualStudies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1996