Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION Which are the clinical benefits and risks of including poor-quality blastocysts (PQBs) in the cohort of biopsied embryos during a cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER PQBs show a worse prognosis with respect to sibling non-PQBs, but their clinical use allows an overall 2.6% increase in the number of live births (LBs) achievable after PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PQBs ( STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This observational cohort study including 2757 oocyte retrievals for PGT-A (mean maternal age, 39.6 ± 3.3 years) conducted at a private IVF centre between April 2013 and May 2018. A total of 1497 PQBs were obtained and their embryological, chromosomal and clinical features were compared to 5250 non-PQBs (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft’s classification) and adjusted for all significant confounders. After defining the overall increase in LBs due to PQBs, we outlined the population of patients who might benefit the most from their clinical use. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS ICSI cycles, involving ovarian stimulation, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification, comprehensive chromosome testing and vitrified-warmed euploid single embryo transfers (SETs), were conducted. Overall analyses and sub-analyses in populations of patients clustered according to maternal age at retrieval and size of the cohort of sibling non-PQBs were performed. Finally, the risk of miscarriage and the chance of LB per biopsied PQB and non-PQB were estimated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE PQBs allowed a 12.4% increase in the cycles where ≥1 blastocyst was biopsied. To date, we report a concurrent 2.6% increase in the cycles resulting in ≥1 LB. On average 0.7 ± 0.9 (range, 0–9) PQBs were obtained per cycle for biopsy, including 0.2 ± 0.4 (range, 0–5) euploid PQBs. Maternal age solely correlates with the prevalence of PQBs from both overall and cycle-based analyses. Indeed, the patients who benefit the most from these embryos (i.e. 18 women achieving their only LBs thanks to PQBs) cluster among women older than 42 years and/or those with no or few sibling non-PQBs (1.1 ± 1.1; range, 0–3). The 1497 PQBs compared to the 5250 non-PQBs showed slower development (Day 5, 10.1% versus 43.9%; Day 6, 60.5% versus 50.8%; Day 7, 29.4% versus 5.2%) and lower euploidy rates (23.5% versus 51%; adjusted OR, 0.36). Among the 195 and 1697 transferred euploid PQBs and non-PQBs, the former involved a lower implantation rate (16.9% versus 52.3%) and a higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (36.4% versus 13.9%), therefore resulting in a lower LB rate (LBR, 10.8% versus 44.6%; adjusted OR, 0.22). Based on these rates, we estimated an overall 1.5% risk of miscarriage and 2.6% chance of LB after euploid vitrified-warmed SET per each biopsied PQB. The same estimates for non-PQBs were 3.7% and 22.8%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The clinical benefit of PQBs is underestimated since they are the last option for transfer and this analysis entailed only the first LB. The higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy here reported might be the consequence of a population of patients of poorer prognosis undergoing the SET of euploid PQBs, an option that requires further investigation. Finally, a cost-benefit analysis is needed in a prospective non-selection fashion. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS PQBs show higher aneuploidy rates. If to be included, PGT-A is recommended. When selected against aneuploid-PQBs, euploid ones could still involve a worse prognosis, yet, their LBR is not negligible. Women should be informed that a poor morphology does not define a non-viable embryo per se, although PQBs show a reduced chance of resulting in an LB. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A