How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (5), e18975
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018975
Abstract
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on mining several million citations, we quantitatively analyze the processes driving paradigm shifts in science. We find that groundbreaking discoveries of Nobel Prize Laureates and other famous scientists are not only acknowledged by many citations of their landmark papers. Surprisingly, they also boost the citation rates of their previous publications. Given that innovations must outcompete the rich-gets-richer effect for scientific citations, it turns out that they can make their way only through citation cascades. A quantitative analysis reveals how and why they happen. Science appears to behave like a self-organized critical system, in which citation cascades of all sizes occur, from continuous scientific progress all the way up to scientific revolutions, which change the way we see our world. Measuring the “boosting effect” of landmark papers, our analysis reveals how new ideas and new players can make their way and finally triumph in a world dominated by established paradigms. The underlying “boost factor” is also useful to discover scientific breakthroughs and talents much earlier than through classical citation analysis, which by now has become a widespread method to measure scientific excellence, influencing scientific careers and the distribution of research funds. Our findings reveal patterns of collective social behavior, which are also interesting from an attention economics perspective. Understanding the origin of scientific authority may therefore ultimately help to explain how social influence comes about and why the value of goods depends so strongly on the attention they attract.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- On Universality in Human Correspondence ActivityScience, 2009
- Novelty and collective attentionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Novelty and Collective AttentionSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of KnowledgeScience, 2007
- Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contributionJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005
- Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team PerformanceScience, 2005
- Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papersJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003
- The Attention economyUbiquity, 2001
- Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and HumanitiesTechnology and Culture, 1980