The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna
- 17 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 109 (40), 16208-16212
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209160109
Abstract
Molecular tools have revolutionized the exploration of biodiversity, especially in organisms for which traditional taxonomy is difficult, such as for microscopic animals (meiofauna). Environmental (eDNA) metabarcode surveys of DNA extracted from sediment samples are increasingly popular for surveying biodiversity. Most eDNA surveys use the nuclear gene-encoding small-subunit rDNA gene (18S) as a marker; however, different markers and metrics used for delimiting species have not yet been evaluated against each other or against morphologically defined species (morphospecies). We assessed more than 12,000 meiofaunal sequences of 18S and of the main alternatively used marker [Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) mtDNA] belonging to 55 datasets covering three taxonomic ranks. Our results show that 18S reduced diversity estimates by a factor of 0.4 relative to morphospecies, whereas COI increased diversity estimates by a factor of 7.6. Moreover, estimates of species richness using COI were robust among three of four commonly used delimitation metrics, whereas estimates using 18S varied widely with the different metrics. We show that meiofaunal diversity has been greatly underestimated by 18S eDNA surveys and that the use of COI provides a better estimate of diversity. The suitability of COI is supported by cross-mating experiments in the literature and evolutionary analyses of discreteness in patterns of genetic variation. Furthermore its splitting of morphospecies is expected from documented levels of cryptic taxa in exemplar meiofauna. We recommend against using 18S as a marker for biodiversity surveys and suggest that use of COI for eDNA surveys could provide more accurate estimates of species richness in the future.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversityTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2012
- Environmental DNAMolecular Ecology, 2012
- Molecular study of worldwide distribution and diversity of soil animalsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Metagenetic community analysis of microbial eukaryotes illuminates biogeographic patterns in deep‐sea and shallow water sedimentsMolecular Ecology, 2011
- Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversityNature Communications, 2010
- Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promisesMolecular Ecology, 2010
- Environmental DNA sequencing primers for eutardigrades and bdelloid rotifersBMC Ecology, 2009
- A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysisBMC Genomics, 2008
- Species detection using environmental DNA from water samplesBiology Letters, 2008
- Challenges for taxonomyNature, 2002