Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?
- 28 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Research Policy
- Vol. 38 (1), 206-215
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction: Future pathways for science policy and research assessment: metrics vs peer review, quality vs impactScience and Public Policy, 2007
- Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian universityResearch Evaluation, 2004
- The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limitsNature, 2002
- A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment ExercisesJournal of Information Science, 2000
- Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the NetherlandsResearch Policy, 1998
- The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeologyJournal of Documentation, 1997
- Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematicsScientometrics, 1996
- Impact factors can misleadNature, 1996
- New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applicationsScientometrics, 1995
- The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990