An Adjustable Sling for the Treatment of All Degrees of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Retrospective Evaluation of Efficacy and Complications After a Minimal Followup of 14 Months
- 30 April 2011
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 185 (4), 1363-1368
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.075
Abstract
Conclusions The Argus adjustable male sling is a valuable adjunct in the treatment of all degrees of stress urinary incontinence. Complications are not uncommon but are mostly Clavien grade I to II. Patients report significantly improved continence and quality of life after treatment.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial Urinary Sphincter Versus Male Sling for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence—What Do Patients Choose?Journal of Urology, 2009
- Postprostatectomy Incontinence: All About Diagnosis and ManagementEuropean Urology, 2009
- Direct Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Pure Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon ExperienceUrology, 2009
- Long-Term Durability and Functional Outcomes Among Patients With Artificial Urinary Sphincters: A 10-Year Retrospective Review From the University of MichiganJournal of Urology, 2008
- Comprehensive Prospective Comparative Analysis of Outcomes Between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Conducted in 2003 to 2005Journal of Urology, 2008
- Outcomes related to placing an artificial urinary sphincter using a single-incision, transverse-scrotal technique in high-risk patientsBJU International, 2008
- An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trialBJU International, 2006
- Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of the New Perineal Bone-Anchored Male SlingEuropean Urology, 2005
- Patient Self-Reporting Questionnaire on Urological Morbidity and Bother after Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2002
- The management of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2002