System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 17 (9), 635-648
- https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2015.0085
Abstract
Background: Adherence to established standards (e.g., International Organization for Standardization [ISO] 15197) is important to ensure comparable and sufficient accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Accuracy evaluation was performed for different SMBG systems available in Europe with three reagent lots each. Materials and Methods: Test procedures followed the recently published revision ISO 15197:2013. Comparison measurements were performed with a glucose oxidase (YSI 2300 STAT Plus™ glucose analyzer; YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH) and a hexokinase (cobas Integra® 400 Plus analyzer; Roche Instrument Center, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) method. Compliance with ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria was determined by calculating the percentage of results within ±15% or within ±0.83 mmol/L of the comparison measurement results for glucose concentrations at and above or below 5.55 mmol/L, respectively, and by calculating the percentage of results within consensus error grid Zones A and B. Results: Seven systems showed with all three tested lots that 95–100% of the results were within the accuracy limits of ISO 15197:2013 and that 100% of results were within consensus error grid Zones A and B, irrespective of the comparison method used. Regarding results of individual lots, slight differences between the glucose oxidase method and the hexokinase method were found. Accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2003 (±20% for concentrations ≥4.2 mmol/L and±0.83 mmol/L for concentrations Conclusions: In this study, seven systems complied with the accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2013. The results also indicate that the comparison measurement method/system is important, as it may have a considerable impact on accuracy data obtained for a system.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analytical Performance of Glucose Monitoring Systems at Different Blood Glucose Ranges and Analysis of Outliers in a Clinical SettingJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2014
- Evaluation of 12 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing: System Accuracy and Measurement ReproducibilityDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2014
- Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Capillary Blood Samples from the FingertipJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013
- Performance Variability of Seven Commonly Used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Systems: Clinical Considerations for Patients and ProvidersJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013
- Lot-to-Lot Variability of Test Strips and Accuracy Assessment of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose according to ISO 15197Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2012
- Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of Seven Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose SystemsDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2011
- System Accuracy Evaluation of 27 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems According to DIN EN ISO 15197Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2010
- Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitorsClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2006
- Between-Lot Variation in External Quality Assessment of Glucose: Clinical Importance and Effect on Participant Performance EvaluationClinical Chemistry, 2005
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986