Race, treatment preferences, and hospice enrollment: Eligibility criteria may exclude patients with the greatest needs for care
Open Access
- 20 January 2009
- Vol. 115 (3), 689-697
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24046
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The requirement that patients give up curative treatment makes hospice enrollment unappealing for some patients and may particularly limit use among African‐American patients. The current study was conducted to determine whether African‐American patients with cancer are more likely than white patients to have preferences for cancer treatment that exclude them from hospice and whether they are less likely to want specific hospice services. METHODS: Two hundred eighty‐three patients who were receiving treatment for cancer at 6 oncology clinics within the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Network completed conjoint interviews measuring their perceived need for 5 hospice services and their preferences for continuing cancer treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months or until death. RESULTS: African‐American patients had stronger preferences for continuing their cancer treatments on a 7‐point scale even after adjusting for age, sex, finances, education, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, quality of life, and physical and psychologic symptom burden (adjusted mean score, 4.75 vs 3.96; β coefficient, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.22‐1.41 [P = .007]). African‐American patients also had greater perceived needs for hospice services after adjusting for these characteristics (adjusted mean score, 2.31 vs 1.83; β coefficient, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.11‐0.92 [P = .01]). However, this effect disappeared after adjusting for household finances. CONCLUSIONS: Hospice eligibility criteria may exclude African‐American patients disproportionately despite greater perceived needs for hospice services in this population. The mechanisms driving this health disparity likely include both cultural differences and economic characteristics, and consideration should be given to redesigning hospice eligibility criteria. Cancer 2009. © 2008 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Should Clinicians Describe Hospice to Patients and Families?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2004
- Family Perspectives on End-of-Life Care at the Last Place of CareJAMA, 2004
- What predicts gastroenterologists' and surgeons' diagnosis and management of common bile duct stones?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- A survey of pain in patients with advanced cancerJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1996
- Prevalence of symptoms among patients with advanced cancer: An international collaborative studyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1996
- Frequency and correlates of fatigue in lung cancer patients receiving radiation therapy: Implications for managementJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1996
- Academy of Hospice Physicians' position statement on access to hospice and palative careJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1996
- Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sampleQuality of Life Research, 1994
- The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distressEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Character of terminal illness in the advanced cancer patient: Pain and other symptoms during the last four weeks of lifeJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1990