Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists
- 30 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 69 (3), 441-449
- https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12976
Abstract
Aims To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results Twenty‐three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high‐magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80% agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80% agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78%) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non‐consensus cases, ill‐formed (6/13, 46%) and fused (7/13, 54%) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill‐formed growth pattern, none (0%, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2%, 23% and 38% of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26%) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill‐formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2012
- Improving the Reproducibility of the Gleason Scores in Small Foci of Prostate Cancer - Suggestion of Diagnostic Criteria for Glandular FusionPathology and Oncology Research, 2011
- Digital Quantification of Five High-Grade Prostate Cancer Patterns, Including the Cribriform Pattern, and Their Association With Adverse OutcomeAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2011
- Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason gradingVirchows Archiv, 2011
- The Potential Impact of Reproducibility of Gleason Grading in Men With Early Stage Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance: A Multi-Institutional StudyJournal of Urology, 2011
- Prostate needle biopsies: interobserver variation and clinical consequences of histopathological re‐evaluationAPMIS, 2011
- A UK‐based investigation of inter‐ and intra‐observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsiesHistopathology, 2006
- A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibilityHistopathology, 2006
- Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimensVirchows Archiv, 2003
- Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologistHuman Pathology, 2001