Reasons for encounters, investigations, referrals, diagnoses and treatments in general practice in Sweden—a multicentre pilot study using electronic patient records
Open Access
- 21 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in The European Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 17 (2), 87-94
- https://doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2010.538675
Abstract
To investigate reasons for encounters, investigations, referrals, diagnoses and treatments in everyday general practice, using electronic patient records (EPR), and possible related differences concerning gender, socio-economic status (SES) and practice location. Four Swedish primary care centres using EPR participated. Distributions of symptoms, investigations, diagnoses and prescribed drugs were registered. In 1055 encounters, the mean patient age was 53; 59% were women. The most common reasons for the encounter were musculoskeletal (21.5%) and respiratory (15.2%) symptoms. A total of 1534 diagnoses were coded, on average 1.5 per encounter. The predominant diagnostic groups, i.e. ICD-10 chapters, were musculoskeletal (17.2%) and respiratory (12.4%). The most common specific diagnoses were essential hypertension (8.1%) and acute upper respiratory infections (3.7%). A total of 1687 prescriptions were issued, on average 1.6 per encounter. The most frequent pharmaceutical groups were nervous (17.7%), respiratory system (16.2%), and cardiovascular (15.7%). The most frequent drugs were phenoxymethyl penicillin (3.7%), diclofenac (2.9%) and acetylsalicylic acid (2.5%). An average of 1.3 laboratory tests was performed per encounter. In 7.5% of encounters, radiology referrals were made; in 12.3% referrals were made to other specialists/therapists, while sick-list certificates were written in 11.7%. There were significant differences concerning symptoms, diagnoses and investigations between female and male patients, urban and rural practices and SES. The musculoskeletal, respiratory and circulatory systems predominated, both as reasons for the encounter and in the diagnoses, but with significant differences concerning gender, SES and practice location.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfallsFamily Practice, 2009
- Detaillierte Erfassung von Inanspruchnahme, Morbidität, Erkrankungsverläufen und Ergebnissen durch episodenbezogene Dokumentation in der Hausarztpraxis innerhalb des Projekts CONTENTDas Gesundheitswesen, 2007
- Collecting information on the quality of prescribing in primary care using semi-automatic data extraction from GPs’ electronic medical recordsInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2005
- Collection and retrieval of structured clinical data from electronic patient records in general practice. A first-phase study to create a health care database for research and quality assessment.Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2004
- Information from primary care: its importance and value. A comparison of information from Slovenia and England and Wales, viewed from the 'Health 21' perspective.European Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Computerisation, coding, data retrieval and related attitudes among Swedish general practitioners—a survey of necessary conditions for a database of diseases and health problemsInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2002
- A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practiceBMJ, 2001
- Patients, diagnoses and processes in general practice in the Nordic countries.An attempt to make data from computerised medical records available for comparable statisticsScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2001
- The diagnosis of cancer in the "roar" of potential cancer symptoms of patients in primary health care Research by means of the computerised journalScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2001
- The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC): new applications in research and computer-based patient records in family practiceFamily Practice, 1996