Capacity and consent
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Vol. 14 (5), 491-499
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001504-200109000-00012
Abstract
In this article, conceptual issues relating to a patient’s decision-making capacity and its assessment are discussed from an ethical perspective. Different proposed standards for the assessment of capacity are discussed, the issue of the risk-relativity of capacity is analysed, and the proper role of tests and instruments to assess capacity is addressed. Attention is paid to underestimated aspects within the current dominant approach towards capacity (assessment), and alternative directions that are critical to the model of decision-making that underlies the dominant approach are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Understanding of Research Consent Disclosures Among Persons With Mental IllnessPsychiatric Services, 2001
- Ethical and Human-Rights Issues in Research on Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision-Making CapacityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Asymmetrical CompetenceBioethics, 1999
- Continuing the Debate over Risk‐related Standards of CompetenceBioethics, 1999
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- Decision making in a schizophrenic population.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- Mentally ill and non-mentally-ill patients' abilities to understand informed consent disclosures for medication: Preliminary data.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988