Board configuration: are diverse boards better boards?
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society
- Vol. 6 (2), 129-147
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610655141
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research paper is to explore the proposition that diversifying the board in terms of gender, ethnicity or skill base may require consideration of the specific strategic environment of the organisation. The proposition arises from the question as to whether or not greater diversity in board configuration is desirable in certain circumstances and considers the group dynamics, skill mix and capabilities that are required by boards under different conditions of change and strategic complexity.Design/methodology/approach: The study examines the financial performance of New Zealand publicly listed companies over a five‐year period and focuses on changes in board composition, strategic activity and implications for corporate performance.Findings: The study finds limited support for the idea that board configuration, strategic context and corporate decision quality may be linked.Originality/value: This paper will be of particular value to those involved in the appointment of directors within the private and public sectors. In particular, it focuses discussion on the strategic environment faced by the organisation and the relevance of a range of potential selection criteria when appointing new directors. It is also of interest to researchers evaluating the value of social capital and gender equity in contemporary organisations as, based on empirical reseach, it challenges conventional thinking. By implication, the paper also questions whether or not boards are actually able to influence key outcomes in the manner expected by legislators.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Board Processes Influence Director and Board Performance? Statutory and performance implicationsCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2005
- Corporate Governance, Institutional Investors and Conflicts of InterestCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2004
- Has Marketing Failed, or was it Never Really Tried?The Marketing Review, 2001
- THE NATURE OF INTERNAL COMPLEXITY IN UNUSUAL ORGANIZATIONS: A STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AND INSENSITIVE HOSPITALS.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1996
- How strategy‐making processes can make a differenceStrategic Management Journal, 1994
- Firm and Industry Effects in Industrial EconomicsSouthern Economic Journal, 1990
- Agency Problems and Residual ClaimsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Editorial dataJournal of Financial Economics, 1976
- Monopoly Power, Ownership Control, and Corporate PerformanceThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1976