Cost-effectiveness analysis of general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA Trial)
Open Access
- 18 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 97 (8), 1218-1225
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7110
Abstract
Background: Health outcomes and costs are both important when deciding whether general (GA) or local (LA) anaesthesia should be used during carotid endarterectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy under LA or GA in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis for whom surgery was advised. Methods: Using patient-level data from a large, multinational, randomized controlled trial (GALA Trial) time free from stroke, myocardial infarction or death, and costs incurred were evaluated. The cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per day free from an event, within a time horizon of 30 days. Results: A patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy under LA incurred fewer costs (mean difference £178) and had a slightly longer event-free survival (difference 0·16 days, but the 95 per cent confidence limits around this estimate were wide) compared with a patient who had GA. Existing uncertainty did not have a significant impact on the decision to adopt LA, over a wide range of willingness-to-pay values. Conclusion: If cost-effectiveness was considered in the decision to adopt GA or LA for carotid endarterectomy, given the evidence provided by this study, LA is likely to be the favoured treatment for patients for whom either anaesthetic approach is clinically appropriate.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carotid Endarterectomy: Technical Practices of Surgeons Participating in the GALA TrialEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2008
- Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular SurgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2008
- GALA: an international multicentre randomised trial comparing general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgeryTrials, 2008
- Cost-effectiveness of endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trialBMJ, 2004
- StrokeThe Lancet, 2003
- Is carotid angioplasty and stenting more cost effective than carotid endarterectomy?Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- Is carotid endarterectomy cost-effective in symptomatic patients with moderate (50% to 69%) stenosis?Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- Cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patientsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- The differing effects of regional and general anaesthesia on cerebral metabolism during carotid endarterectomyEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1996