Means-End Frames and the Politics and Myths of Organizational Fields
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization Studies
- Vol. 25 (6), 897-921
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604042406
Abstract
The processing of means-end frames is proposed as a key to understanding the reproduction and evolution of organizational fields. In lieu of regarding ‘rationalized myths’ as established social constructs that are diffused within a field, the present analysis looks into how the field constituents construct a rationalized myth, the operations through which they strive to accomplish this, and the unresolved divergences and problems tied to establishing shared understandings of central causal chains. It is argued that the social construction of means-end frames is central to preserving a shared understanding of an organizational field’s goals and the organizing principles by which these can be realized. In participating in the construction and interpretation of means-end frames the central actors reproduce and evolve the organizational field. The processing of means-end frames may contribute to both field reproduction and destabilization. Based on an analysis of the Danish hospital field, it is demonstrated how the processing of a means-end frame may serve several functions in an organizational field—the reproduction of the field, its trajectory, power structure, truces and overarching regime. But it may also contribute to field destabilization via the actors’ different interpretations and projects, the contestation of central institutions, or via unforeseeable consequences.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Institutional Theories and Public Institutions: Traditions and AppropriatenessPublished by SAGE Publications ,2003
- THEORIZING CHANGE: THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF INSTITUTIONALIZED FIELDS.The Academy of Management Journal, 2002
- INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE U.S. CHEMICAL INDUSTRY.The Academy of Management Journal, 1999
- Comparative Perspectives on Social MovementsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39Social Studies of Science, 1989
- Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic ChangeOrganization Studies, 1988
- Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement ParticipationAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- The Heterogeneity of TextsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1986
- Writing Science — Fact and FictionPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1986
- A Comparative Model of Interorganizational ConflictAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979