Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Corporate Real Estate
- Vol. 6 (2), 133-148
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010410812306
Abstract
In the early 1990s, a few organisations in the Netherlands began to experiment with flexible workplaces. Traditional cellular offices and the open‐plan offices or team‐oriented bullpen spaces in which everyone had their own fixed workplace were no longer a matter of course. Making use of modern information and communication technology, the pioneers redirected their attention towards the sharing of activity related workplaces in a combi‐office. Economic considerations (eg low occupancy of expensive workplaces), organisational developments (network organisations, teamwork, fast exchange of knowledge, part‐time work) and external developments (globalisation, strong competition) are important drivers for change. The aim is to stimulate new ways of working (dynamic, less closely linked to place and time), to improve labour productivity and to make major cost savings (fewer workplaces, fewer square metres), without reducing employee satisfaction. Since then a number of new offices have been realised. Twelve per cent of organisations that have moved recently use flexible workspaces for the most part or exclusively. An important question now is whether the aims have been achieved. What are the actual benefits? What are the risks? How should consultants advise their clients? The field is dominated by the opinions of those in favour and those against. Statements expressing the successes or failures of flexible offices contradict each other. Hard data are almost lacking. Due to the scarcity of empirically supported insights, the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands together with the Centre for People and Buildings and the Centre for Facility Management are carrying out investigations into the costs and benefits of workplace innovation. This paper reports on progress so far, with a focus on employee satisfaction and labour productivity.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Traditional versus Open Office DesignEnvironment and Behavior, 2002
- Organisational dilemmas and workplace solutionsJournal of Corporate Real Estate, 2002
- Tomorrow’s offices through today’s eyes: Effects of innovation in the working environmentJournal of Corporate Real Estate, 2001
- TRADITIONAL VERSUS OPEN OFFICES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIOTECHNICAL, SOCIAL RELATIONS, AND SYMBOLIC MEANING PERSPECTIVES.The Academy of Management Journal, 1987
- Results of an Ergonomic Investigation of Large-Space OfficesHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1973