Clarifying the Concept of Representation
- 25 August 2011
- journal article
- forum
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 105 (3), 621-630
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000189
Abstract
This response to Andrew Rehfeld's “Representation Rethought” (American Political Science Review2009) takes up his criticisms of my “Rethinking Representation” (American Political Science Review2003) to advance a more relational and systematic approach to representation. To this end, it suggests replacing the “trustee” concept of representation with a “selection model” based on the selection and replacement of “gyroscopic” representatives who are both relatively self-reliant in judgment and relatively nonresponsive to sanctions. It explores as well the interaction between representatives’ (and constituents’) perceptions of reality and their normative views of what the representative ought to represent. Building from the concept of surrogate representation and other features of legislative representation, it argues for investigating, both normatively and empirically, not only the characteristics of individual representatives emphasized by Rehfeld's analysis but also the representative–constituent relationship and the larger representative system, including both elected and nonelected representatives, inside and outside the legislature.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political ScienceAnnual Review of Political Science, 2008
- The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic TheoryAnnual Review of Political Science, 2008
- The Check Is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2008
- Three Conceptions of Democratic ControlConstellations, 2008
- Accountability in an Unequal WorldThe Journal of Politics, 2007
- Signaling Character in Electoral CompetitionAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical MassPolitics & Gender, 2006
- Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in CongressAmerican Political Science Review, 1978
- Political Ambitions, Volunteerism, and Electoral AccountabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- Public Attitudes Toward the Representational Roles of Legislators and JudgesMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1965