Digital communication between clinician and patient and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review in general practice
Open Access
- 29 November 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 65 (641), e813-e821
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15x687853
Abstract
Background Increasingly, the NHS is embracing the use of digital communication technology for communication between clinicians and patients. Policymakers deem digital clinical communication as presenting a solution to the capacity issues currently faced by general practice. There is some concern that these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities in accessing health care. It is not known what impact they may have on groups who are already marginalised in their ability to access general practice. Aim To assess the potential impact of the availability of digital clinician–patient communication on marginalised groups’ access to general practice in the UK. Design and setting Realist review in general practice. Method A four-step realist review process was used: to define the scope of the review; to search for and scrutinise evidence; to extract and synthesise evidence; and to develop a narrative, including hypotheses. Results Digital communication has the potential to overcome the following barriers for marginalised groups: practical access issues, previous negative experiences with healthcare service/staff, and stigmatising reactions from staff and other patients. It may reduce patient-related barriers by offering anonymity and offers advantages to patients who require an interpreter. It does not impact on inability to communicate with healthcare professionals or on a lack of candidacy. It is likely to work best in the context of a pre-existing clinician–patient relationship. Conclusion Digital communication technology offers increased opportunities for marginalised groups to access health care. However, it cannot remove all barriers to care for these groups. It is likely that they will remain disadvantaged relative to other population groups after their introduction.This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do general practitioners experience providing care to refugees with mental health problems? A qualitative study from DenmarkBMC Family Practice, 2013
- Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnessesEmergencias, 2012
- Effectiveness and impact of networked communication interventions in young people with mental health conditions: A systematic reviewPatient Education and Counseling, 2011
- Relational barriers to depression help-seeking in primary carePatient Education and Counseling, 2011
- General practitioners and carers: a questionnaire survey of attitudes, awareness of issues, barriers and enablers to provision of servicesBMC Family Practice, 2010
- Use of Communication Technologies to Cost-Effectively Increase the Availability of Interpretation Services in Healthcare SettingsTelemedicine and e-Health, 2010
- African American Women’s Beliefs, Coping Behaviors, and Barriers to Seeking Mental Health ServicesQualitative Health Research, 2009
- Responses to language barriers in consultations with refugees and asylum seekers: a telephone survey of Irish general practitionersBMC Family Practice, 2008
- Experiences of refugees and asylum seekers in general practice: a qualitative studyBMC Family Practice, 2007
- Understanding help seeking behaviour among male offenders: qualitative interview studyBMJ, 2007