Is repetition failure critical for the development of muscle hypertrophy and strength?
- 24 March 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Vol. 26 (4), 375-383
- https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12445
Abstract
This investigation sought to determine the effect of resistance training to failure on functional, structural and neural elbow flexor muscle adaptation. Twenty-eight males completed a 4-week familiarization period and were then counterbalanced on the basis of responsiveness across; non-failure rapid shortening (RS; rapid concentric, 2 s eccentric), non-failure stretch-shortening (SSC; rapid concentric, rapid eccentric), and failure control (C, 2 s concentric, 2 s eccentric), for a 12-week unilateral elbow flexor resistance training regimen, 3 × week using 85% of one repetition maximum (1RM). 1RM, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), and muscle activation (EMGRMS ) of the agonist, antagonist, and stabilizer muscles were assessed before and after the 12-week training period. The average number of repetitions per set was significantly lower in RS 4.2 [confidence interval (CI): 4.2, 4.3] and SSC 4.2 (CI: 4.2, 4.3) compared with C 6.1 (CI: 5.8, 6.4). A significant increase in 1RM (30.5%), MVC (13.3%), CSA (11.4%), and agonist EMGRMS (22.1%) was observed; however, no between-group differences were detected. In contrast, antagonist EMGRMS increased significantly in SSC (40.5%) and C (23.3%), but decreased in RS (13.5%). Similar adaptations across the three resistance training regimen suggest repetition failure is not critical to elicit significant neural and structural changes to skeletal muscle.Keywords
Funding Information
- New South Wales Fire Brigades (Australia)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of concentric and eccentric velocity during heavy-load non-ballistic elbow flexion resistance exerciseJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2014
- Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young menJournal of Applied Physiology, 2012
- Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub‐fractional synthetic responses in menJournal Of Physiology-London, 2012
- Short‐term unilateral resistance training affects the agonist–antagonist but not the force–agonist activation relationshipMuscle & Nerve, 2011
- Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young menJournal Of Physiology-London, 2010
- Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young MenPLOS ONE, 2010
- Resistance exercise‐induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young menJournal Of Physiology-London, 2009
- A functional insulin‐like growth factor receptor is not necessary for load‐induced skeletal muscle hypertrophyJournal Of Physiology-London, 2008
- Differential effects of strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal responses, strength, and muscle power gainsJournal of Applied Physiology, 2006
- Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance trainingBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2002