The Swiss cheese model of safety incidents: are there holes in the metaphor?
Open Access
- 9 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 5 (1), 71
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-71
Abstract
Background Reason's Swiss cheese model has become the dominant paradigm for analysing medical errors and patient safety incidents. The aim of this study was to determine if the components of the model are understood in the same way by quality and safety professionals. Methods Survey of a volunteer sample of persons who claimed familiarity with the model, recruited at a conference on quality in health care, and on the internet through quality-related websites. The questionnaire proposed several interpretations of components of the Swiss cheese model: a) slice of cheese, b) hole, c) arrow, d) active error, e) how to make the system safer. Eleven interpretations were compatible with this author's interpretation of the model, 12 were not. Results Eighty five respondents stated that they were very or quite familiar with the model. They gave on average 15.3 (SD 2.3, range 10 to 21) "correct" answers out of 23 (66.5%) – significantly more than 11.5 "correct" answers that would expected by chance (p < 0.001). Respondents gave on average 2.4 "correct" answers regarding the slice of cheese (out of 4), 2.7 "correct" answers about holes (out of 5), 2.8 "correct" answers about the arrow (out of 4), 3.3 "correct" answers about the active error (out of 5), and 4.1 "correct" answers about improving safety (out of 5). Conclusion The interpretations of specific features of the Swiss cheese model varied considerably among quality and safety professionals. Reaching consensus about concepts of patient safety requires further work.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Babel: prospects for a universal patient safety taxonomyInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005
- The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse eventsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005
- A typology of organisational culturesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Culture and quality: an anthropological perspectiveInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004
- Patient Safety Efforts Should Focus on Medical ErrorsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2002
- Patient Safety Efforts Should Focus on Medical InjuriesJAMA, 2002
- Diagnosing "vulnerable system syndrome": an essential prerequisite to effective risk managementQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2001
- How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical Risk Unit and Association of Litigation and Risk Management protocolBMJ, 2000
- Understanding adverse events: human factors.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1995
- A LOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR CATEGORIZING HIGHWAY SAFETY PHENOMENA AND ACTIVITYThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1972