Not by Behaviour Alone: In Defence of Self-Reports and ‘Finger Movements’
Open Access
- 29 May 2018
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 13 (2), e26196
- https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i2.26196
Abstract
We agree that it is important to study behaviour in psychology but warn against putting behaviour on a scientific pedestal. We argue that this would be problematic for at least three reasons. First, behaviour should not be seen as disconnected from thoughts and feelings; moreover, quarantining different domains of responses does not help to explain human psychology comprehensively. Second, because behaviour hardly ever speaks for itself, it is essential to gather other responses from participants (including self-reports and “finger movement responses”) to understand what their behaviour really means. Finally, and most importantly, we observe that the main response to the crisis in social psychology has consisted of calls to change our empirical practices. Here this call takes the form of arguing for studying one particular dependent variable: behaviour. Even though we agree that there is value in measuring behaviour, promoting such practices is not going to be a silver bullet that overcomes the key challenges that social psychology as a discipline is currently facing. To do that, a more fruitful avenue would be to focus on the theory that needs to underpin and inform that empirical work. Indeed, without a proper theoretical framework to guide the study of behaviour, developing a “science of behaviour” is in our view rather futile.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Psychology Still a Science of Behaviour?Social Psychological Bulletin, 2018
- 50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged FollowershipAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, 2017
- Introduction to the special issue: Unplugging the Milgram machineTheory & Psychology, 2015
- The Disappearance of Independence in Textbook Coverage of Asch’s Social Pressure ExperimentsTeaching of Psychology, 2015
- ‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram's ‘obedience’ experimentsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2014
- Nothing by Mere Authority: Evidence that in an Experimental Analogue of the Milgram Paradigm Participants are Motivated not by Orders but by Appeals to ScienceJournal of Social Issues, 2014
- In Their Own Words: Explaining Obedience to Authority Through an Examination of Participants' CommentsSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2011
- Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007
- Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1956
- Opinions and Social PressureScientific American, 1955