Reference change values: how useful are they?
- 6 March 2008
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 61 (4), 426-427
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2007.054833
Abstract
A simple comparison between two sequential results is not as straightforward as it seems. It should be remembered that each result is associated with its own inherent random variation, meaning that each result obtained is, in fact, a dispersion rather than a singular value. This random variation comprises both variation associated with laboratory activity (pre-analytical and analytical variation) and inherent biological variation (intra-individual) (see box 1).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is a significant difference between sequential laboratory results?Calf muscle pain can indicate localised vasculitisJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2007
- The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variationScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2004
- Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelinesClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2004
- Reference change values and power functionscclm, 2004
- Biological variation data are necessary prerequisites for objective autoverification of clinical laboratory dataAccreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002
- Proficiency testing performance: a case study with modelingClinical Biochemistry, 2002
- Variability of the biological variation.Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2002
- Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progressScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1999
- Quality specifications derived from objective analyses based upon clinical needsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1999
- Temporal Changes in the Concentrations of Serum Constituents in Healthy MenAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 1979