Evaluating Survivorship Care Plans: Results of a Randomized, Clinical Trial of Patients With Breast Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 20 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (36), 4755-4762
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.36.8373
Abstract
Purpose: An Institute of Medicine report recommends that patients with cancer receive a survivorship care plan (SCP). The trial objective was to determine if an SCP for breast cancer survivors improves patient-reported outcomes. Patients and Methods: Women with early-stage breast cancer who completed primary treatment at least 3 months previously were eligible. Consenting patients were allocated within two strata: less than 24 months and ≥ 24 months since diagnosis. All patients were transferred to their own primary care physician (PCP) for follow-up. In addition to a discharge visit, the intervention group received an SCP, which was reviewed during a 30-minute educational session with a nurse, and their PCP received the SCP and guideline on follow-up. The primary outcome was cancer-related distress at 12 months, assessed by the Impact of Event Scale (IES). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, patient satisfaction, continuity/coordination of care, and health service measures. Results: Overall, 408 survivors were enrolled through nine tertiary cancer centers. There were no differences between groups on cancer-related distress or on any of the patient-reported secondary outcomes, and there were no differences when the two strata were analyzed separately. More patients in the intervention than control group correctly identify their PCP as primarily responsible for follow-up (98.7% v 89.1%; difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 3.9 to 15.9; P = .005). Conclusion: The results do not support the hypothesis that SCPs are beneficial for improving patient-reported outcomes. Transferring follow-up to PCPs is considered an important strategy to meet the demand for scarce oncology resources. SCPs were no better than a standard discharge visit with the oncologist to facilitate transfer.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry dataThe Lancet, 2011
- Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statementBMJ, 2008
- Ensuring Quality Care for Cancer Survivors: Implementing the Survivorship Care PlanSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 2008
- Implementing a Survivorship Care Plan for Patients With Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Future Supply and Demand for Oncologists : Challenges to Assuring Access to Oncology ServicesJournal of Oncology Practice, 2007
- Long term care planning for cancer survivors: a health services research agendaJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2007
- Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail: Improving the Quality of Care With Survivorship Care PlansJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update)CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- Toward a Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Model of Health Care Research UseScience Communication, 1998
- Anxiety in Long-Term Cancer Survivors Influences The Acceptability of Planned Discharge From Follow-UpPsycho‐Oncology, 1997