How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
- 31 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Sport Science
- Vol. 17 (3), 360-368
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261
Abstract
Wearable activity trackers have become popular for tracking individual's daily physical activity, but little information is available to substantiate the validity of these devices in step counts. Thirty-five healthy individuals completed three conditions of activity tracker measurement: walking/jogging on a treadmill, walking over-ground on an indoor track, and a 24-hour free-living condition. Participants wore 10 activity trackers at the same time for both treadmill and over-ground protocol. Of these 10 activity trackers three were randomly given for 24-hour free-living condition. Correlations of steps measured to steps observed were r=0.84 and r=0.67 on a treadmill and over-ground protocol, respectively. The mean MAPE (mean absolute percentage error) score for all devices and speeds on a treadmill was 8.2% against manually counted steps. The MAPE value was higher for over-ground walking (9.9%) and even higher for the 24-hour free-living period (18.48%) on step counts. Equivalence testing for step count measurement resulted in a significant level within +/- 5% for the Fitbit Zip, Withings Pulse, and Jawbone UP24 and within +/- 10% for the Basis B1 band, Garmin VivoFit, and SenseWear Armband Mini. The results show that the Fitbit Zip and Withings Pulse provided the most accurate measures of step count under all three different conditions (i.e. treadmill, over-ground, and 24-hour condition), and considerable variability in accuracy across monitors and also by speeds and conditions.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured SettingsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2016
- Accuracy of Smartphone Applications and Wearable Devices for Tracking Physical Activity DataPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2015
- Accuracy of 2 Activity Monitors in Detecting Steps in People With Stroke and Traumatic Brain InjuryPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2014
- Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west studyBMC Public Health, 2012
- Effects of a Pedometer-Based Intervention on Physical Activity Levels After Cardiac RehabilitationJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 2009
- The Association Between Physical Activity in Leisure Time and Leukocyte Telomere LengthArchives of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Validity of 2 Devices for Measuring Steps Taken by Older Adults in Assisted-Living FacilitiesJournal of Physical Activity & Health, 2008
- Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workersPreventive Medicine, 2004
- Validity of 10 Electronic Pedometers for Measuring Steps, Distance, and Energy CostMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
- A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activityIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1997