A Comparison of the H2 Sorption Capacities of Isostructural Metal–Organic Frameworks With and Without Accessible Metal Sites: [{Zn2(abtc)(dmf)2}3] and [{Cu2(abtc)(dmf)2}3] versus [{Cu2(abtc)}3]
- 22 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Angewandte Chemie
- Vol. 47 (40), 7741-7745
- https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200801488
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multifunctional Fourfold Interpenetrating Diamondoid Network: Gas Separation and Fabrication of Palladium NanoparticlesChemistry – A European Journal, 2008
- High-Throughput Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and Application to CO 2 CaptureScience, 2008
- Cation-Dependent Nonlinear Optical Behavior in an Octupolar 3D Anionic Metal–Organic Open FrameworkAngewandte Chemie, 2007
- A Microporous Metal–Organic Framework for Gas‐Chromatographic Separation of AlkanesAngewandte Chemie, 2006
- A Homochiral Metal–Organic Material with Permanent Porosity, Enantioselective Sorption Properties, and Catalytic ActivityAngewandte Chemie, 2006
- Pore surface engineering of microporous coordination polymersChemical Communications, 2005
- [Co2(ppca)2(H2O)(V4O12)0.5]: A Framework Material Exhibiting Reversible Shrinkage and Expansion through a Single‐Crystal‐to‐Single‐Crystal Transformation Involving a Change in the Cobalt Coordination EnvironmentAngewandte Chemie, 2005
- Design, Synthesis, and Photochemical Behavior of Poly(benzyl ester) Dendrimers with Azobenzene Groups throughout Their ArchitectureThe Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2004
- Reticular synthesis and the design of new materialsNature, 2003
- A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material [Cu 3 (TMA) 2 (H 2 O) 3 ]
n
Science, 1999