The Paradox of Power in Planning Practice
Open Access
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Planning Education and Research
- Vol. 11 (3), 206-215
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9201100305
Abstract
Planners rely on the protocol of the professional planner to cope with the politics of planning. However, this protocol promises more than it delivers as a source of moral authority, and delivers more than it promises as a source of political power. The protocol simultaneously resolves and reproduces the liberal paradox between freedom and justice. Hence, the ambivalence planners frequently express about their encounters with power on the job may reflect their use of this protocol. Two planning stories drawn from face-to-face interviews illustrate how two practitioners facing similar problems adopt different versions of the professional protocol to justify their actions. Analysis of each tale, using critical and postmodern theory, explores how the professional protocol excuses the exercise of power in ways that obscure the liberal paradox. A third planning story offers an example of how a practitioner handles the inherent tension of professional practice in a liberal society without using the professional protocol either to impose closure or to foster premature reassurance.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Politics of PostmodernismPublished by Informa UK Limited ,2003
- Into Postmodern WeightlessnessJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1991
- The Critique of Impure ReasonPolitical Theory, 1990
- Contingency, Irony, and SolidarityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- A pragmatic inquirySociety, 1988
- Open moral communitiesSociety, 1988
- Conflict at Large: A National Survey of Planners and Political ConflictJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1988
- I. Poststructuralism and Political ReflectionPolitical Theory, 1988
- Planning Threatened: A Preliminary Report of Planners and Political ConflictJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1987
- Why the Rational Paradigm Persists — The Resistance of Professional Education and Practice to Alternative Forms of PlanningJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1986