Literary criticism
- 18 March 1982
- book chapter
- book charpter
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract
Literary critics today fall into two broad categories. There are the academics, out to impress their colleagues and instruct their pupils. And there are, in the great tradition of Dryden, creative writers meditating on their craft. In Greece scholars seem to have been called kritikoi before they took over the term grammatikos. With Quintilian the authors come to a professional rhetor, well qualified, as well as inclined, to assess Cicero as well as praise him. Quintilian knew how literary criticism of oratory should be conducted. It is a mark of his sophistication that only recently has scholars approached Cicero in this wide and unprejudiced way. Cicero brought to the theory of oratory a width that it had never known before and was rarely to know again. He thinks often of an ideal orator, who shall have all the qualities of Cicero himself and more besides.Keywords
This publication has 94 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Roman Calendar, 190-168 B. C.Phoenix, 1973
- Valerius Cato, Furius Bibaculus, and TicidasClassical Philology, 1971
- Lucan's Use of Virgilian ReminiscenceClassical Philology, 1968
- Department of paediatricsIrish Journal of Medical Science, 1963
- Virgil and the "Odyssey"Phoenix, 1963
- Catullus 66. 75-88Classical Philology, 1960
- Horace on the Origins of "Satura"Phoenix, 1960
- Parody in Juvenal and T. S. EliotClassical Philology, 1958
- The Quarrel between Lucan and NeroClassical Philology, 1957
- Lucan and His Roman CriticsClassical Philology, 1931