Cancer Fatalism and Poor Self-Rated Health Mediate the Association between Socioeconomic Status and Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in England
- 1 October 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 20 (10), 2132-2140
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0453
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the psychological predictors of colorectal screening uptake in England and mediators of associations between uptake and socioeconomic status (SES). This study tested the hypotheses that although higher threat and efficacy beliefs, lower cancer fatalism, lower depression, and better self-rated health would predict higher screening uptake, only efficacy beliefs, fatalism, depression, and self-rated health would mediate associations between uptake and SES. Methods: Data from 529 adults aged 60 to 69 who had completed a postal survey in 2005–2006 were linked with data on fecal occult blood test (FOBt) uptake recorded at the screening “hub” following its introduction in 2007, resulting in a prospective study. Results: Screening uptake was 56% and was higher among people with higher SES, better self-rated health, higher self-efficacy beliefs, and lower cancer fatalism in univariate analyses. Path analysis on participants with complete data (n = 515) showed that both better self-rated health and lower cancer fatalism were directly associated with higher uptake of FOBt screening and significantly mediated pathways from SES to uptake. Lower depression only had an indirect effect on uptake through better self-rated health. Efficacy beliefs did not mediate the relationship between SES and uptake. Conclusion: SES differences in uptake of FOBt in England are partially explained by differences in cancer fatalism, self-rated health, and depression. Impact: This is one of only a few studies to examine mediators of the relationship between SES and screening uptake, and future research could test the effectiveness of interventions to reduce fatalistic beliefs to increase equality of uptake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(10); 2132–40. ©2011 AACR.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in EnglandInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcomeEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary studyCancer Causes & Control, 2010
- Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Specific Effects of Depression and ObesityAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in EnglandBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screeningBMC Public Health, 2008
- Breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns over 15 years for UK south Asian ethnic minority populations, corrected for differences in socio-demographic characteristicsBMC Public Health, 2008
- Colorectal cancer screening: A comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countriesInternational Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process modelCommunication Monographs, 1992