Relationship between Spatial Working Memory Performance and Diet Specialization in Two Sympatric Nectar Bats
Open Access
- 9 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (9), e23773
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023773
Abstract
Behavioural ecologists increasingly recognise spatial memory as one the most influential cognitive traits involved in evolutionary processes. In particular, spatial working memory (SWM), i.e. the ability of animals to store temporarily useful information for current foraging tasks, determines the foraging efficiency of individuals. As a consequence, SWM also has the potential to influence competitive abilities and to affect patterns of sympatric occurrence among closely related species. The present study aims at comparing the efficiency of SWM between generalist (Glossophaga soricina) and specialist (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae) nectarivorous bats at flowering patches. The two species differ in diet – the generalist diet including seasonally fruits and insects with nectar and pollen while the specialist diet is dominated by nectar and pollen yearlong – and in some morphological traits – the specialist being heavier and with proportionally longer rostrum than the generalist. These bats are found sympatrically within part of their range in the Neotropics. We habituated captive individuals to feed on artificial flower patches and we used infrared video recordings to monitor their ability to remember and avoid the spatial location of flowers they emptied in previous visits in the course of 15-min foraging sequences. Experiments revealed that both species rely on SWM as their foraging success attained significantly greater values than random expectations. However, the nectar specialist L. yerbabuenae was significantly more efficient at extracting nectar (+28% in foraging success), and sustained longer foraging bouts (+27% in length of efficient foraging sequences) than the generalist G. soricina. These contrasting SWM performances are discussed in relation to diet specialization and other life history traits.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flower Bats (Glossophaga soricina) and Fruit Bats (Carollia perspicillata) Rely on Spatial Cues over Shapes and Scents When Relocating FoodPLOS ONE, 2010
- Evolution of nectarivory in phyllostomid bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia)BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2010
- Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) remember the location of numerous fruit treesAnimal Cognition, 2009
- Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactusAnnals of Botany, 2009
- Effects of Sugar Composition and Concentration on Food Selection by Saussure's Long-nosed Bat (Leptonycteris curasoae) and the Long-tongued Bat (Glossophaga soricina)Journal of Mammalogy, 2007
- Effect of diet quality on carbon and nitrogen turnover and isotopic discrimination in blood of a New World nectarivorous batJournal Of Experimental Biology, 2006
- Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Pollinator Activity and Consequences for Plant Reproductive Success and Mating Patterns in Bat‐pollinated Bombacaceous Trees1Biotropica, 2004
- Effects of Forest Fragmentation on the Colima Long-nosed Bat (Musonycteris harrisoni) Foraging in Tropical Dry Forest of Jalisco, Mexico1Biotropica, 2002
- Population Dynamics of Leptonycteris curasoae (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in Jalisco, MexicoJournal of Mammalogy, 1997
- Working MemoryScience, 1992