System approach to games and competitive playing: Reply to Lebed (2006)
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Sport Science
- Vol. 7 (1), 47-53
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390701216831
Abstract
In this article, we respond to some criticisms by Lebed ( 2006 Lebed, F. 2006. System approach to games and competitive playing. European Journal of Sport Science, 6: 33–42. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ) of our previous research (McGarry, Anderson, Wallace, Hughes, & Franks, 2002 McGarry, T. , Anderson, D. I. , Wallace, S. A. , Hughes, M. and Franks, I. M. 2002. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20: 771–781. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ) in which we reported that (a) the space–time interactions of players in sports (squash) contests might usefully be considered as a dynamical system, (b) that the other racket sports of tennis and badminton might likewise subscribe to a similar description, and (c) that doubles-play in these same racket sports might further be explained using the same self-organizing principles. From there, we speculated that team sports (taking soccer as an example) might ultimately also subscribe to similar principles, thus offering the possibility of a common underpinning for the space–time movements of sports players that seemingly give rise to patterned behaviours that are nonetheless unique. Lebed ( 2006 Lebed, F. 2006. System approach to games and competitive playing. European Journal of Sport Science, 6: 33–42. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ) criticized this interpretation of sports (squash) contests as a dynamical system and instead offered a different account, though unfortunately these criticisms are inaccurate and unfounded. The most important point overlooked by Lebed ( 2006 Lebed, F. 2006. System approach to games and competitive playing. European Journal of Sport Science, 6: 33–42. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ), and thus reiterated here, is that the essentials for a dynamical system – namely, the presence of coupled oscillators that comprise the system, as well as the sharing of information among the coupled oscillators that produces the patterned formations – are present in the racket sports for both singles-play and doubles-play. The presence of these essentials for team sports, however, must remain a matter of speculation for the time being as noted previously (McGarry et al., 2002 McGarry, T. , Anderson, D. I. , Wallace, S. A. , Hughes, M. and Franks, I. M. 2002. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20: 771–781. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ).Keywords
Funding Information
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A dynamical analysis of tennis: Concepts and dataJournal of Sports Sciences, 2005
- Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing systemJournal of Sports Sciences, 2002
- On the presence and absence of behavioural traits in sport: An example from championship squash match-playJournal of Sports Sciences, 1999
- Development, Application, and Limitation of a Stochastic Markov Model in Explaining Championship Squash PerformanceResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1996
- In search of invariant athletic behaviour in sport: An example from championship squash match‐playJournal of Sports Sciences, 1996
- A stochastic approach to predicting competition squash match‐playJournal of Sports Sciences, 1994
- A synergetic theory of quadrupedal gaits and gait transitionsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1990
- A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movementsBiological Cybernetics, 1985
- Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horsesNature, 1981
- Homeokinetics: A Physical Science for Complex SystemsScience, 1978