Comparison of Aviary, Barn and Conventional Cage Raising of Chickens on Laying Performance and Egg Quality
Open Access
- 22 June 2014
- journal article
- Published by Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
- Vol. 27 (8), 1196-1203
- https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13394
Abstract
This study intended to compare the productive performance of three different layer raising systems; conventional cage (CC), barn (BR) and aviary (AV). The AV is welfare bestowed housing that allows free locomotion for birds within the BR. The BR allows bird’s free locomotion inside BR but without multilevel structures. Both pullets and cockerels were housed together in both AV and BR, but only pullets in CC. Seventeen weeks old Lohmann Brown Lite (n = 800) pullets were housed in AV during this study. The same age layer pullets were simultaneously assigned to either at CC or BR to compare egg production performance with AV. The duration of experiment was 40 weeks (from 21st to 60th week). There were no remarkable differences in egg production, hen day egg production (HDEP) and average egg weight among three rearing systems. First 20 weeks (phase-1) average HDEP (%) of AV, CC, and BR were 85.9, 88.8, 87.1 and average egg weights (g) were 57.5, 59.9, and 56.9 respectively. Those of the remaining 20 weeks (phase-2) were 87.1, 87.9, 85.5 and 64.2, 63.0 62.1, respectively. Daily feed intakes (122 g, 110 g, 125 g); feed conversion ratio (2.4, 2.1, 2.5) and daily egg mass (53.9 g, 54.4 g, 52.8 g) data from AV, CC, and BR were not influenced significantly by the respective raising systems. Daily feed intake of layers in both AV (124 g) and BR (127 g) tended to be higher than that in CC (113 g) during phase-2. Overall, exterior egg quality (dirty and cracked eggs) in both phases was superior in BR compared with AV and CC, whereas CC generated intermediate results. This study indicated that the HDEP per se in AV and BR were not significantly different from that in CC. The study implied that the facility depreciation cost for AV and cost for increased feed intake in AV compared to CC are believed to be critical to evaluate the cost effectiveness of egg production in AV.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2009
- A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systemsFood Chemistry, 2008
- Effects of Genotype and Housing System on the Laying Performance of Chickens in Different Seasons in the Semi-Humid TropicsInternational Journal of Poultry Science, 2007
- Xanthophylls in Commercial Egg Yolks: Quantification and Identification by HPLC and LC-(APCI)MS Using a C30 PhaseJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006
- Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg qualityBritish Poultry Science, 2006
- Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristicsBritish Poultry Science, 2004
- Factors Affecting Egg Internal Quality and Egg Shell Quality in Laying HensThe Journal of Poultry Science, 2004
- Measuring the mechanical stiffness of an eggshell using resonant frequency analysisBritish Poultry Science, 1999
- Effects on Production, Health and Egg Quality of Varying Proportions of Wheat and Barley in Diets for Two Hybrids of Laying Hens Kept in Different Housing SystemsActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 1996
- Aviary Systems and Conventional Cages for Laying Hens: Effects on Production, Egg Quality, Health and Bird Location in Three HybridsActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 1995