Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies
- 30 March 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
- Vol. 6 (6), 749-767
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0553-9
Abstract
Breast cancer is globally a major threat for women’s health. Screening and adequate follow-up can significantly reduce the mortality from breast cancer. Human second reading of screening mammograms can increase breast cancer detection rates, whereas this has not been proven for current computer-aided detection systems as “second reader”. Critical factors include the detection accuracy of the systems and the screening experience and training of the radiologist with the system. When assessing the performance of systems and system components, the choice of evaluation methods is particularly critical. Core assets herein are reference image databases and statistical methods.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for breast cancer with mammographyPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rateEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2008
- Correcting for selection bias via cross-validation in the classification of microarray dataPublished by Institute of Mathematical Statistics ,2008
- Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosisThe British Journal of Radiology, 2007
- Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening MammographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Continuing declines in cancer mortality in the European UnionAnnals Of Oncology, 2007
- Usefulness of Texture Analysis for Computerized Classification of Breast Lesions on MammogramsJournal of Digital Imaging, 2006
- Re: Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection SystemJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Normalization of local contrast in mammogramsIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2000
- A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-ValidationThe American Statistician, 1983