Grader Variability and the Importance of Reference Standards for Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy
Top Cited Papers
- 12 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Ophthalmology
- Vol. 125 (8), 1264-1272
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.034
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- FEEDBACK ON A PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED IMAGE DATABASE: THE MESSIDOR DATABASEImage Analysis and Stereology, 2014
- COMPARISON OF STANDARDIZED CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION WITH FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPH GRADING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA SEVERITYRetina, 2013
- Automated Analysis of Retinal Images for Detection of Referable Diabetic RetinopathyJAMA Ophthalmology, 2013
- Digital versus Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy SeverityInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2010
- A Practical Manual of Diabetic Retinopathy ManagementClinical and Experimental Optometry, 2009
- Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Single-Field Digital Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy ScreeningOphthalmology, 2006
- Gradient-based learning applied to document recognitionProceedings of the IEEE, 1998
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Grading Diabetic Retinopathy from Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photographs—An Extension of the Modified Airlie House ClassificationOphthalmology, 1991
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960