How does the health and well-being of young Australian vegetarian and semi-vegetarian women compare with non-vegetarians?
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 10 (5), 436-442
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980007217938
Abstract
Objective: To compare the sociodemographic characteristics, health status and health service use of vegetarians, semi-vegetarians and non-vegetarians.Design: In cross-sectional data analyses of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health in 2000, 9113 women (aged 22–27 years) were defined as non-vegetarians if they reported including red meat in their diet, as semi-vegetarians if they excluded red meat and as vegetarians if they excluded meat, poultry and fish from their diet.Results: The estimated prevalence was 3% and 10% for vegetarian and semi-vegetarian young women. Compared with non-vegetarians, vegetarians and semi-vegetarians were more likely to live in urban areas and to not be married. Vegetarians and semi-vegetarians had lower body mass index (mean (95% confidence interval): 22.2 (21.7–22.7) and 23.0 (22.7–23.3) kg m− 2) than non-vegetarians (23.7 (23.6–23.8) kg m− 2) and tended to exercise more. Semi-vegetarians and vegetarians had poorer mental health, with 21–22% reporting depression compared with 15% of non-vegetarians (P < 0.001). Low iron levels and menstrual symptoms were also more common in both vegetarian groups. Vegetarian and semi-vegetarian women were more likely to consult alternative health practitioners and semi-vegetarians reported taking more prescription and non-prescription medications. Compared with non-vegetarians, semi-vegetarians were less likely and vegetarians much less likely to be taking the oral contraceptive pill.Conclusion: The levels of physical activity and body mass indices of the vegetarian and semi-vegetarian women suggest they are healthier than non-vegetarians. However, the greater reports of menstrual problems and the poorer mental health of these young women may be of clinical significance.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- EPIC–Oxford:lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UKPublic Health Nutrition, 2003
- Who does not gain weight? Prevalence and predictors of weight maintenance in young womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- Lifestyle-related characteristics of young low-meat consumers and omnivores in Sweden and NorwayJournal of Adolescent Health, 2002
- Adolescent VegetariansArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2002
- Characteristics of vegetarian adolescents in a multiethnic urban populationJournal of Adolescent Health, 2001
- ‘Gentle caring experience’: Seeking alternative health care in CanadaHealth & Place, 2001
- Relative Weight, Weight Loss Efforts and Nutrient Intakes among Health-Conscious Vegetarian, Past Vegetarian and Nonvegetarian Women Ages 18 to 50.Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 2000
- Teenage Vegetarianism: Prevalence, Social and Cognitive ContextsAppetite, 1998
- Adolescent VegetariansArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
- REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987