Southern Agrarian Labor Contracts as Impediments to Cotton Mechanization
- 3 March 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 47 (1), 45-70
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700047410
Abstract
The traditional view of cotton mechanization, first advanced by rural sociologists in the 1920s, is that southern agrarian institutions impeded progress. Recently their view has been questioned. New studies attribute much of the southern lag to factors like small-scale production, cheap labor, the cotton crop, and environment. I contribute to the debate by emphasizing how the structure of the southern economy encouraged landlords to use annual labor contracts that hindered attempts to mechanize. I present evidence that supports the traditional view and suggest how the incentive structure of annual labor contracts delayed invention of the mechanical cotton picker.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A History of Mechanization in the Cotton South: The Institutional HypothesisThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1985
- On the Fixed Nature of Sharecropping ContractsThe Economic Journal, 1985
- Labor for the Picking: the New Deal in the SouthThe Journal of Economic History, 1983
- Contractual Mix in Southern Agriculture since the Civil War: Facts, Hypotheses, and TestsThe Journal of Economic History, 1982
- Mechanizing cotton production in the American south: The tractor, 1915–1960Explorations in Economic History, 1981
- Tenure choice in Southern agriculture, 1930–1960Explorations in Economic History, 1981
- Wages and Unemployment in a Poor Agrarian Economy: A Theoretical and Empirical AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 1979
- Cotton, Corn and Risk in the Nineteenth CenturyThe Journal of Economic History, 1975
- Mechanizing the Cotton Harvest in the Nineteenth-Century SouthThe Journal of Economic History, 1965