Are cephalosporins adequate for antimicrobial prophylaxis for cardiac surgery involving implants?
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 41 (1), 122-123
- https://doi.org/10.1086/430831
Abstract
Sir—We believe that Bratzler et al. [1] should include in the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) guidelines the recommendation of vancomycin as an option for antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac and vascular surgery involving implantation of prosthetic valves or other foreign materials. In patients who undergo cardiac surgery, coagulase-negative strains and coagulase-positive strains of Staphylococcus are the major cause of deep surgical-site infections (SSIs) and postoperative prosthetic-valve endocarditis. In many hospitals, 70%–80% of coagulase-negative and 40%–50% of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus strains are methicillin resistant. Currently, only cephalosporins, which lack activity against methicillin-resistant organisms, are listed in the SIP guidelines for routine prophylaxis for all cardiac surgeries.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention ProjectClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Risk Factors for Postoperative Mediastinitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Glycopeptides Are No More Effective than -Lactam Agents for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infectionsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2002
- Poststernotomy Mediastinitis Due to Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible CasesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001